Use this Platform for searching books from the library
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Curbing corruption in Asian countries [electronic resource] : an impossible dream? /

by Quah, Jon S. T.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Research in public policy analysis and management: v. 20.Publisher: Bingley, U.K. : Emerald, 2011Description: 1 online resource (xxxv, 533 p.) : ill.ISBN: 9780857248206 (electronic bk.) :.Subject(s): Political Science -- Public Affairs & Administration | Political Science -- Public Policy -- General | Public administration | Civil service & public sector | Political corruption -- Asia | Political corruption -- Asia -- Prevention | Misconduct in office -- AsiaOnline resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
ch. 1. Corruption in Asian countries : causes, consequences and control patterns / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 2. Japan / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 3. India / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 4 The Philippines / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 5. Taiwan / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 6. Singapore / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 7. Hong Kong / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 8. Thailand / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 9. South Korea / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 10. Indonesia / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 11. Mongolia / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 12. Curbing corruption : an impossible dream? / Jon S.T. Quah.
Summary: As corruption is a serious problem in many Asian countries their governments have introduced many anti-corruption measures since the 1950s. This book analyzes and evaluates the anti-corruption strategies employed in Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mongolia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. These countries are selected because they represent the three major patterns of corruption control with Japan adopting Pattern 1 (anti-corruption laws without any anti-corruption agency [ACA]); India, the Philippines and Taiwan employing Pattern 2 (anti-corruption laws with multiple ACAs); and Singapore, Hong Kong SAR, Thailand, South Korea, Indonesia, and Mongolia belonging to Pattern 3 (anti-corruption laws with a single ACA). Among the ten countries only Singapore and Hong Kong SAR have succeeded in minimizing corruption because of the commitment of their political leaders in curbing corruption, their favorable policy contexts, and the impartial implementation of effective anti-corruption measures. On the other hand, the other eight Asian countries have failed to curb corruption because of the lack of political will, their unfavorable policy contexts, and their reliance on ineffective anti-corruption measures.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

ch. 1. Corruption in Asian countries : causes, consequences and control patterns / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 2. Japan / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 3. India / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 4 The Philippines / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 5. Taiwan / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 6. Singapore / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 7. Hong Kong / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 8. Thailand / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 9. South Korea / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 10. Indonesia / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 11. Mongolia / Jon S.T. Quah -- ch. 12. Curbing corruption : an impossible dream? / Jon S.T. Quah.

As corruption is a serious problem in many Asian countries their governments have introduced many anti-corruption measures since the 1950s. This book analyzes and evaluates the anti-corruption strategies employed in Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mongolia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. These countries are selected because they represent the three major patterns of corruption control with Japan adopting Pattern 1 (anti-corruption laws without any anti-corruption agency [ACA]); India, the Philippines and Taiwan employing Pattern 2 (anti-corruption laws with multiple ACAs); and Singapore, Hong Kong SAR, Thailand, South Korea, Indonesia, and Mongolia belonging to Pattern 3 (anti-corruption laws with a single ACA). Among the ten countries only Singapore and Hong Kong SAR have succeeded in minimizing corruption because of the commitment of their political leaders in curbing corruption, their favorable policy contexts, and the impartial implementation of effective anti-corruption measures. On the other hand, the other eight Asian countries have failed to curb corruption because of the lack of political will, their unfavorable policy contexts, and their reliance on ineffective anti-corruption measures.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

@ © 2018. Kampala University Library. P.O Box 25454 Gaba, Kampala, Uganda. Email: library@ku.ac.ug: Website: http://www.ku.ac.ug All rights reserved.

Powered by Koha